Donald Trump’s rally in Montana stirred up a significant social media reaction when Celine Dion’s iconic song, ‘My Heart Will Go On’, was played just before the presidential candidate made his appearance. The choice of a song famously associated with the sinking ship in Titanic raised eyebrows among observers, with many taking to social media to express their thoughts. Some even speculated whether there was a deliberate attempt to troll Trump by playing this particular song, questioning if there was a mole within Trump’s team.
A point of contention that arises from this incident is whether Trump’s campaign had the necessary rights to use the song in a public setting. The song ‘My Heart Will Go On’ is owned by 20th Century Fox, and it remains unclear whether proper authorization was obtained for its use at the rally. Reports indicate that Dion’s representatives have been contacted for comment on the matter, indicating a potential legal issue surrounding the unauthorized use of copyrighted material.
This is not the first time that Trump’s team has used Celine Dion’s song at their events. The track was also played at a rally in November 2020, as well as at subsequent rallies in June 2021 and January 2021. The repeated use of ‘My Heart Will Go On’ has drawn criticism and commentary, with some noting the irony of its association with a sinking ship and the turbulent events linked to Trump’s rallies.
Aside from the musical choice, Trump’s rally in Montana was marked by other controversial moments. During his speech, Trump misgendered Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, who had recently won a gold medal at the Paris Olympics. Furthermore, Trump mocked overweight Democrat Senator John Tester, showcasing a pattern of derogatory and disrespectful behavior towards individuals. Additionally, French musician Woodkid raised concerns about the unauthorized use of his music in a campaign video featuring Trump, highlighting a lack of respect for intellectual property rights.
Trump’s rally in Montana may have inadvertently sparked a series of controversies, from the choice of music to disrespectful comments and potential legal issues. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical conduct and adherence to copyright laws in public events, especially those involving political figures.